Siemens S7-1200 G2 vs G1 PLC comparison showing design and performance differences

Siemens S7-1200 G2 vs G1: The Truth Engineers Actually Need (Before You Make a Costly Mistake)

If you’ve been researching the Siemens S7-1200 G2 vs G1, you’ve probably seen a lot of articles saying the same thing:

“G2 is faster, more powerful, and the obvious upgrade.”

That’s not wrong — but it’s also not the full story.

From an engineering perspective, choosing between G1 and G2 is not about which one is better, but which one fits your project reality.

This article will walk you through the real-world differences, hidden risks, and practical decision rules — so you don’t make an expensive mistake.

 


 

1. The Simple Truth (Skip Everything Else If You Want)

New projects → Choose G2

Existing systems → Stay with G1

Retrofit projects → Do NOT directly switch to G2

If you understand this, you already avoid 80% of common mistakes.

Now let’s explain why.

 


 

2. Performance: Better, But Often Irrelevant

Yes, G2 is clearly more powerful:

Faster processing speed

Larger memory

Better handling of data and communication

But here’s the reality:

Most industrial applications:

Digital I/O control

Simple sequencing

Basic automation logic

�� These do not need more performance

Engineering takeaway:

Performance is rarely the deciding factor unless you are doing:

Motion control

Data-heavy systems

Advanced communication

 


 

3. Compatibility: The Biggest Trap

This is where most online articles mislead you.

❗ G1 and G2 are NOT compatible

That means:

I/O modules cannot be reused

Expansion modules cannot be reused

Hardware dimensions have changed

Real-world impact:

Switching from G1 to G2 means:

Rebuilding your control cabinet

Rewiring I/O

Reconfiguring hardware

Retesting the entire system

�� This is NOT an upgrade — it’s a system redesign

 


 

4. Software Migration: Not Plug-and-Play

Using TIA Portal, many assume:

“I’ll just open the old project and switch CPU.”

That’s not how it works.

What actually happens:

Hardware configuration must be rebuilt

I/O addressing must be verified

Communication needs reconfiguration

Testing is required

Time cost:

Small project: 1–3 days

Medium project: several days

Large project: 1+ week

 


 

5. Communication & IT: A Shift in Direction

G2 is designed for:

Ethernet-based systems

IT/OT integration

Remote access

IIoT / data-driven environments

This is great if you need:

MES integration

Cloud connectivity

Remote diagnostics

But…

Older systems using:

Legacy communication

Older field devices

�� May require extra effort to integrate

 


 

6. Function Changes: Not Just “More Features”

G2 introduces:

Improved motion control

Modern diagnostic tools (like NFC)

But also:

Changes in how some functions work

Different engineering workflows

Reality in the field:

Experienced engineers often feel:

“This doesn’t behave like the old system.”

There is a learning curve

 


 

7. Real Engineering Scenarios

Scenario 1: New Machine / New Line

✅ Choose G2

Why:

Future-proof

Better integration capabilities

Longer lifecycle

 


 

Scenario 2: Existing Production Line

✅ Stay with G1

Why:

No redesign needed

Spare parts already available

Lowest risk

Golden rule:

If it works, don’t touch it.

 


 

Scenario 3: Retrofit / Upgrade Project

⚠️ Be very careful

Switching to G2 means:

Hardware redesign

Software adjustments

Downtime risk

�� Often better options:

Stay with G1

Or jump to a higher platform (like S7-1500)

 


 

Scenario 4: Digitalization / Smart Factory

✅ Choose G2

Why:

Better networking

Easier integration with modern systems

 


 

8. Common Mistakes (Avoid These)

❌ Mistake 1: Treating G2 as a drop-in replacement

It’s not.

❌ Mistake 2: Ignoring cabinet size changes

It may not physically fit.

❌ Mistake 3: Assuming software migration is easy

It isn’t.

❌ Mistake 4: Mixing G1 and G2 hardware

Impossible.

❌ Mistake 5: Breaking your spare parts strategy

G1 and G2 cannot share inventory.

 


 

9. Final Decision Guide

Use this quick checklist:

Want stability and minimal risk? → G1

Starting from scratch? → G2

Upgrading an existing system? → Think twice before G2

 


 

10. Final Thought

G2 is not “better” in every situation.

It’s simply:

More modern

More powerful

Less compatible with the past

And in industrial automation, compatibility often matters more than performance.

 


 

If you're unsure which option fits your project, feel free to reach out — choosing the wrong PLC platform can cost far more than the hardware itself.

Need help choosing between G1 and G2 for your project? Contact us for expert advice.

Email: info@bxlyplc.com

Whatsapp me

 

Related Article:

Siemens SIMATIC S7-1200 G2 vs. G1: The Ultimate Comparison for 2026 Upgrades

Zurück zum Blog

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

One Company, Two Specialized Platforms

To better serve the diverse needs of the global industrial sector, we have established two dedicated online platforms, each with a clear mission:

  1. BXLY PLC (bxlyplc.com): Your trusted source for core automation control components. We ensure the seamless operation of your production lines with genuine parts from leading brands like Siemens, Beckhoff, and Omron.
  2. IAS Robot (iasrobot.com): Your expert partner for industrial robot maintenance and repair. We keep robotic arms in motion with high-quality spare parts compatible with ABB, KUKA, Yaskawa, and Fanuc.

This dual-platform strategy allows us to provide deep expertise and focused supply chain management in each field. Regardless of your need—be it for a control cabinet or a robot cell—you are dealing with the same commitment to quality, reliability, and customer support.

Together, we cover the full spectrum of industrial automation.